v5:dictionary:adofieldobject
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionLast revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
| reference:adofieldobject [2015/12/28 03:43] – mnewnham | v5:dictionary:adofieldobject [2016/02/01 21:48] – [MySQL] mnewnham | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== adoFieldObject ====== | ====== adoFieldObject ====== | ||
| ===== Description ===== | ===== Description ===== | ||
| - | When the [[dictionary: | + | When the [[v5:dictionary:metacolumns]] method is executed by ADOdb, the data retrieved is placed in an array of adoFieldObjects. This is a class based around the following format: |
| class ADOFieldObject { | class ADOFieldObject { | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| ^name|The name of the field in the database| | ^name|The name of the field in the database| | ||
| ^max_length|The meaning of this field varies, based on the type of the field| | ^max_length|The meaning of this field varies, based on the type of the field| | ||
| - | ^type|The type of the field as described by the database. In order to retrieve the portable type this value must be sent to the [[dictionary: | + | ^type|The type of the field as described by the database. In order to retrieve the portable type this value must be sent to the [[v5:dictionary:metatype]] method, and the return value used.| |
| ===== Sample Of Program To Retrieve ADOFieldObjects ===== | ===== Sample Of Program To Retrieve ADOFieldObjects ===== | ||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
| ==== MySQL ==== | ==== MySQL ==== | ||
| - | Note that currently, MySql does not return an ADOfieldObject object. | + | Note that before ADOdb Version 5.21, MySQL did not return an ADOfieldObject object. |
| stdClass Object | stdClass Object | ||
v5/dictionary/adofieldobject.txt · Last modified: 2023/05/20 17:50 by dregad